From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Hanquez Subject: Re: future plans for libxl? Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:48:01 +0100 Message-ID: <4BC6C4B1.3040604@eu.citrix.com> References: <4BC578DF.9000508@amd.com> <4BC6BE62.3020000@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "admin@dmarkey.com" Cc: Andre Przywara , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Ian Jackson , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 15/04/10 08:26, David Markey wrote: > Are there any plans for python bindings for libxl? It's definitely something that would have to be done since there's a plan to port xend to libxl, but at the moment there's nothing available there's an ocaml binding in the XCI-unstable tree, but it's probably not what you're looking for :) > I could probably do something up with ctypes, but I assume the ABI isnt > at all stable to do that yet. it should be fairly stable, and the only part left are new calls. however there's still some area which are WIP, so i wouldn't expect full ABI stability just yet. -- Vincent