From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Haley Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Add IPv6 address checkpoint handler Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:35:01 -0400 Message-ID: <4BC76A65.7060909@hp.com> References: <1270748932-26745-1-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <1270748932-26745-4-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1270748932-26745-4-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Dan Smith Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Dan Smith wrote: > +static int inet6_restore(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx, > + struct net_device *dev, > + struct net *net, > + struct ckpt_netdev_addr *addr) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + rtnl_lock(); > + ret = inet6_addr_add(net, dev->ifindex, &addr->inet6_addr, > + addr->inet6_prefix_len, IFA_F_PERMANENT, > + INFINITY_LIFE_TIME, INFINITY_LIFE_TIME); > + rtnl_unlock(); Is using IFA_F_PERMANENT correct here? Should you save the flags from the address when checkpointing? Permanent means it was added by the user, not by the kernel, so you could be changing things slightly. -Brian