From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4BC859AC.1090206@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:35:56 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4BC848F0.3090704@domain.hid> <4BC856E5.1050600@domain.hid> <4BC85785.6050807@domain.hid> <4BC858AC.8040905@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4BC858AC.8040905@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [git pull] RTDM fixes and reworks List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: Alexis Berlemont , xenomai-core Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> The following changes since commit 113ea4d56e8b215cb56ae7673013163ea5a5987d: >>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix (1): >>>> switchtest: increase stack sizes >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> git://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-jki.git for-upstream >>>> >>>> >>>> This is the first of likely three rounds of patches for 2.5.x. It mostly >>>> deals with introducing rtdm_rt_capable to replace the >>>> __xn_exec_conforming marks of RTDM syscalls and with deprecating RT >>>> open/socket/close for RTDM devices. The latter affects quite a few >>>> devices in our tree, so I'm CC'ing the maintainers to check if they see >>>> any problems in dropping RT creation/closure at this point. >>>> >>>> Besides some smaller fixes and an irqbench refactoring, this series also >>>> contains a solution for the confusions about incompatible rttest >>>> devices. It simply avoids collisions be using different device names for >>>> the different device subclasses. >>> switchtest already used another solution for that problem: the different >>> devices use different ioctls. So, IMO we already had a solution for that >>> issue. >> Look at the diffstat of switchtest. I wanted to fix the issue for the >> rest without replicating code. > > I would agree with you for patches in xenomai-head. But in that case, > this is an ABI breakage. It's internal testing stuff. If you think anyone out there may have written his own back- or front-end, I could make all test devices additionally register under the old rttest as well. I just don't think it's worth the effort. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux