From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4BC85A28.30006@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:38:00 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4BC848F0.3090704@domain.hid> <4BC856E5.1050600@domain.hid> <4BC85785.6050807@domain.hid> <4BC858AC.8040905@domain.hid> <4BC859AC.1090206@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4BC859AC.1090206@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [git pull] RTDM fixes and reworks List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Alexis Berlemont , xenomai-core Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>> The following changes since commit 113ea4d56e8b215cb56ae7673013163ea5a5987d: >>>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix (1): >>>>> switchtest: increase stack sizes >>>>> >>>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>>> >>>>> git://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-jki.git for-upstream >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is the first of likely three rounds of patches for 2.5.x. It mostly >>>>> deals with introducing rtdm_rt_capable to replace the >>>>> __xn_exec_conforming marks of RTDM syscalls and with deprecating RT >>>>> open/socket/close for RTDM devices. The latter affects quite a few >>>>> devices in our tree, so I'm CC'ing the maintainers to check if they see >>>>> any problems in dropping RT creation/closure at this point. >>>>> >>>>> Besides some smaller fixes and an irqbench refactoring, this series also >>>>> contains a solution for the confusions about incompatible rttest >>>>> devices. It simply avoids collisions be using different device names for >>>>> the different device subclasses. >>>> switchtest already used another solution for that problem: the different >>>> devices use different ioctls. So, IMO we already had a solution for that >>>> issue. >>> Look at the diffstat of switchtest. I wanted to fix the issue for the >>> rest without replicating code. >> I would agree with you for patches in xenomai-head. But in that case, >> this is an ABI breakage. > > It's internal testing stuff. > > If you think anyone out there may have written his own back- or > front-end, I could make all test devices additionally register under the > old rttest as well. I just don't think it's worth the effort. No, the point is anyone out there with a 2.5.0 user-space Xenomai should be able to run it with Xenomai 2.5.3. So, there should be at least a Kconfig option to keep the old names. -- Gilles.