From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4BC85D15.1090103@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:50:29 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4BC848F0.3090704@domain.hid> <4BC856E5.1050600@domain.hid> <4BC85785.6050807@domain.hid> <4BC858AC.8040905@domain.hid> <4BC859AC.1090206@domain.hid> <4BC85A28.30006@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4BC85A28.30006@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [git pull] RTDM fixes and reworks List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: Alexis Berlemont , xenomai-core Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>>> The following changes since commit 113ea4d56e8b215cb56ae7673013163ea5a5987d: >>>>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix (1): >>>>>> switchtest: increase stack sizes >>>>>> >>>>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>>>> >>>>>> git://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-jki.git for-upstream >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This is the first of likely three rounds of patches for 2.5.x. It mostly >>>>>> deals with introducing rtdm_rt_capable to replace the >>>>>> __xn_exec_conforming marks of RTDM syscalls and with deprecating RT >>>>>> open/socket/close for RTDM devices. The latter affects quite a few >>>>>> devices in our tree, so I'm CC'ing the maintainers to check if they see >>>>>> any problems in dropping RT creation/closure at this point. >>>>>> >>>>>> Besides some smaller fixes and an irqbench refactoring, this series also >>>>>> contains a solution for the confusions about incompatible rttest >>>>>> devices. It simply avoids collisions be using different device names for >>>>>> the different device subclasses. >>>>> switchtest already used another solution for that problem: the different >>>>> devices use different ioctls. So, IMO we already had a solution for that >>>>> issue. >>>> Look at the diffstat of switchtest. I wanted to fix the issue for the >>>> rest without replicating code. >>> I would agree with you for patches in xenomai-head. But in that case, >>> this is an ABI breakage. >> It's internal testing stuff. >> >> If you think anyone out there may have written his own back- or >> front-end, I could make all test devices additionally register under the >> old rttest as well. I just don't think it's worth the effort. > > No, the point is anyone out there with a 2.5.0 user-space Xenomai should > be able to run it with Xenomai 2.5.3. So, there should be at least a > Kconfig option to keep the old names. OK, that's fine. Will add a switch to register devices with the old names instead. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux