All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-git] Wolfgang Mauerer : RTDM: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:37:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC8682E.4090406@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BC8674B.5090302@domain.hid>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>>> GIT version control wrote:
>>>>>>> Module: xenomai-jki
>>>>>>> Branch: for-upstream
>>>>>>> Commit: 55ebde80258b5b6c3d29d37b5f30a3199faf0881
>>>>>>> URL:    http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-jki.git;a=commit;h=55ebde80258b5b6c3d29d37b5f30a3199faf0881
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Author: Wolfgang Mauerer <wolfgang.mauerer@domain.hid>
>>>>>>> Date:   Tue Mar 30 11:13:33 2010 +0200
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> RTDM: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The rework in 95278926edc559d4 misses the case that context can be NULL,
>>>>>>> which can (and has) triggered a kernel oops. Take care of this case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Mauerer <wolfgang.mauerer@domain.hid>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
>>>>>> I still think that fix is a useles waste of time. Let us merge
>>>>>> Philippe's patches instead.
>>>>> Please accept that Philippe's patch is orthogonal to this bug.
>>>>>
>>>>> And it didn't work as-is. I'll post a rework which has the same benefit
>>>>> (avoiding to poll on pending context references) - once it is tested.
>>>> Ok. I am fine with any variation as long as:
>>>> - close returns immediately even if the request is not taken into
>>>> account immediately;
>>>> - the file descriptor index is available again as soon as close returns;
>>>> - the kernel objects attached to the file descriptor are destroyed when
>>>> the last reference to it is closed.
>>> That's precisely what I implemented. Additionally, I had to take care of
>>> RTDM drivers deferring the close via EAGAIN and some other minor aspects.
>> I am afraid EAGAIN gets translated automatically into ENOMERGE ;-)
> 
> Sorry, I'm also concerned about legacy compatibility. So this is a
> must-have.
> 
> But don't worry, this is an internal detail between driver and RTDM.
> Neither the user nor drivers that makes no use of it will notice.
> 
>>>> In shoft: POSIX conformance.
>>> At least blocking has nothing to do with POSIX (some drivers will
>>> continue to block in their close handlers). And - AFAIU - the order of
>>> releasing the fd internally and blocking on something during close is
>>> not specified.
>> The point is that the close handler should not be called when close is
>> called, but when the last reference to the file descriptor is closed,
>> asynchronously if need be. So, it may block. But the close service
>> should return immediately.
>>
>> Maybe it is not POSIX, but it is the way it should be, and the way
>> people expect a sane driver API to answer. Crappy drivers which do not
>> answer to SIGINT are simply not acceptable and only a waste developer
>> time (and POSIX mandates EINTR in that case).
> 
> We can't change these bits. The close handler will continue to be called
> when the request is issued and possibly once again (or more if it asks
> for this via EAGAIN) when the final release happens.

As fare as I remember Philippe's patch fixed these bits. I have no
problem if the polling happens in a kernel thread (or workqueue, as far
as I remember Philippe's patch), and the close service has already
returned and freed the file descriptor.

-- 
					    Gilles.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-16 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <E1O2jBF-0000vQ-JB@xenomai.org>
2010-04-16 12:19 ` [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-git] Wolfgang Mauerer : RTDM: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-04-16 12:31   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-04-16 12:58     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-04-16 13:09       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-04-16 13:28         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-04-16 13:34           ` Jan Kiszka
2010-04-16 13:37             ` Gilles Chanteperdrix [this message]
2010-04-16 13:10     ` Philippe Gerum
2010-04-16 14:04       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-04-16 14:26         ` Philippe Gerum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BC8682E.4090406@domain.hid \
    --to=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.