Re: [PATCH v4] rfs: Receive Flow Steering

[Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>]

> Even under a hybrid model I think phrasing it as networking leading
> the scheduler here is a little strong.  The scheduler is in both cases
> the most 'informed' place to make these decisions, but I think it
> could benefit from more knowledge.  In the 'virgin' single flow case
> without any steering the network stack is currently able to implicitly
> hint to the scheduler where flows could be most efficiently served due
> to wake-affine balancing behaviors.  This is a natural side-effect of
> wake-ups being sourced by the networking cpus.

Hinting to the scheduler is fine - so long as the final say is the scheduler. 
Presumably it is the thing that knows about the other forces tugging at where to 
run the thread - where its memory is allocated, what other flows are coming to 
it etc.

rick jones