From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755320Ab0DQJAS (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2010 05:00:18 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:50078 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755142Ab0DQJAP (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2010 05:00:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4BC978A3.8010502@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:00:19 +0800 From: Lai Jiangshan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , LKML , kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] kvm: do not need hardware_disable when CPU_UP_CANCELED Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When CPU_UP_CANCELED, hardware_enable() has not been called at the CPU which is going up because raw_notifier_call_chain(CPU_ONLINE) has not been called for this cpu. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan --- diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index 5a0cd19..b03f863 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -1921,11 +1921,6 @@ static int kvm_cpu_hotplug(struct notifier_block *notifier, unsigned long val, cpu); hardware_disable(NULL); break; - case CPU_UP_CANCELED: - printk(KERN_INFO "kvm: disabling virtualization on CPU%d\n", - cpu); - smp_call_function_single(cpu, hardware_disable, NULL, 1); - break; case CPU_ONLINE: printk(KERN_INFO "kvm: enabling virtualization on CPU%d\n", cpu);