From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4BCC07C0.5050601@web.de> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:35:28 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] uml: Fix build breakage after slab.h changes References: <4BCB353A.3040806@web.de> <4BCB788E.2040501@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <4BCB788E.2040501@kernel.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigECEAA47507809F97268BA43A" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Jeff Dike , Linux Kernel Mailing List , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Tiger Yang List-ID: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigECEAA47507809F97268BA43A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, >=20 > On 04/19/2010 01:37 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> We now have to to include linux/slab.h explicitly for kmalloc & friend= s. >> Files that build against host headers already get their prototypes via= >> um_malloc.h, linux/slab.h may even be unavailable. >=20 > Hmmm... my test um build was okay but I don't know much about details > of um builds.=20 We may use different configs. Also, your userland includes have to lack slab.h. > I suppose this patch will go through um tree? Good question. Does such a tree exist? I'm sitting on a few more um cleanups & fixes, and so far I'm working against Linus' tree as I failed to find anything more recent. Jan --------------enigECEAA47507809F97268BA43A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkvMB8AACgkQitSsb3rl5xSVZgCfVGI6pJXVFibUZ6Gbuy1Ue1BY VK0An00HqFcHT7Bv2Oi7vp8v1ceZtr1s =LFFY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigECEAA47507809F97268BA43A--