From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1O3rt5-0005xu-0m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:23:47 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42069 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O3rt3-0005wn-C6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:23:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1O3rt1-0005VG-2I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:23:45 -0400
Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.82.174]:35074)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1O3mEI-0006ja-Hk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 04:21:18 -0400
Message-ID: <4BCC1275.9010800@aurel32.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:21:09 +0200
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, resend] [STABLE] Sync OSS_GETVERSION handling
	with head
References: <20100411161732.GA2221@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
	<20100418205222.GB22688@hall.aurel32.net>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1004191128230.1540@linmac>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1004191128230.1540@linmac>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Cc: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

malc a écrit :
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:17:32PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
>>> As suggested by Andreas F?rber, here is a cumulative patch that syncs
>>> OSS_GETVERSION handling with head by merging the following commits:
>>>
>>> 1. oss: issue OSS_GETVERSION ioctl only when needed
>>>    6d246526ce3c145b2831285def6983f5de6190d3
>>>
>>> 2. oss: fix fragment setting
>>>    3d709fe73a77c40e263b3af6e650fd4b519c3562
>>>
>>> 3. Workaround for broken OSS_GETVERSION on FreeBSD, part two
>>>    72ff25e4e98d6dba9286d032b9ff5432553bbad5
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
>> I would actually prefer a patch series instead of a cumulative patch, so
>> that we can match commits between HEAD and stable-0.12.
>>
>> Also malc, do you have any comment on that?
> 
> I don't get this: what is that i need to comment on? The patches were
> commited to master, so i don't have anything against them.
> 

Do you think they are fine to commit to stable, do they really fixes
important bugs there?

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net