From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: vbarinov <vbarinov@embeddedalley.com>,
alsa-devel <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>,
mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Cliff Cai <cliff.cai@analog.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
dg@emlix.com, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Sedji Gaouaou <sedji.gaouaou@atmel.com>,
"kyungmin.park" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
"Candelaria Villareal, Jorge" <jorge.candelaria@ti.com>,
ben-linux <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp
Subject: Re: ASoC - Support for multiple components
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:14:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BCC6557.1030703@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271686144.3208.305.camel@odin>
Liam Girdwood wrote:
> Currently ASoC is designed around a single CODEC and a single platform
> DMA engine in every sound card instance. This is fine for most embedded
> devices but current smart phone and STB designs are starting to outgrow
> this architecture.
>
> I'm currently working on adding ASoC support for multiple different
> CODECs and Platforms (DMA, Audio Engines) into a single sound card
> instance. This work will allow ASoC to support N CODECs and N platforms
> per sound card instance and also allow better integration of audio
> components from GSM MODEMs, BT, FM transceivers and PCM DSPs.
Yea!
> I've now split each ASoC component (i.e. DMA, CODEC, DAI) into driver
> and device structures. This now means each ASoC component is a regular
> kernel device and can have private device data and platform_data. It
> should also provide better support for open firmware and flattened
> device tree.
Yea!
> I've CC'ed folks on this mail who have either contributed or maintain
> ASoC architecture code. Please have a look at your architecture and test
> if you can. I only have access to OMAP and pxa3xx hardware and as such
> have only tested the changes on these two architectures only. I'd
> appreciated anyone else testing on the other architectures too.
I'll take a look at it this week or next.
> The changes are all purely mechanical to component registration and
> component private data only. However, some architectures (txx9, imx,
> s3c) required some extra effort to use the device model as they had (to
> varying degrees) coupled their DMA and DAI code more tightly. The fsl
> platform also required extra work around the open firmware interface.
> Grant/Timur do we still need soc-of-simple now that all components are
> regular devices ?
I've never looked at soc-of-simple before, so I can't say. Obviously, I've never needed it, and I never planned to use it.
> The code is in my topic/multi-component branch here :-
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lrg/asoc-2.6.git
>
> It's currently a patch for each component for easier review atm but will
> be rebased into a single commit when it's ready for upstream so it won't
> break bisect.
>
> If the testing can be done quickly then we can go for 2-6.35 otherwise
> we are looking at 2.6.36.
Ok.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-19 14:09 ASoC - Support for multiple components Liam Girdwood
2010-04-19 14:14 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2010-04-19 15:15 ` Grant Likely
2010-04-19 16:25 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-04-19 17:14 ` Mark Brown
2010-04-19 17:23 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-04-19 17:03 ` Mark Brown
2010-04-20 7:17 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2010-04-20 10:46 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-04-21 5:53 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2010-04-21 7:18 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-04-21 17:41 ` Mark Brown
2010-04-26 10:49 ` Mark Brown
2010-04-26 11:17 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-04-26 14:24 ` Mark Brown
2010-04-26 12:05 ` Timur Tabi
2010-04-26 13:13 ` Mark Brown
2010-04-21 21:07 ` Timur Tabi
2010-04-21 22:13 ` Timur Tabi
2010-04-22 11:27 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-04-22 14:52 ` Timur Tabi
2010-04-22 11:03 ` Liam Girdwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BCC6557.1030703@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=cliff.cai@analog.com \
--cc=dg@emlix.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=jorge.candelaria@ti.com \
--cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net \
--cc=morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sedji.gaouaou@atmel.com \
--cc=vbarinov@embeddedalley.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.