From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rc80211_minstrel.c:70 WARNING with 2.6.34-rc4
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:41:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BCC95CC.7030109@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100419174100.GA5312@linux-m68k.org>
On 2010-04-19 7:41 PM, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> > I am getting tons of these http://www.kerneloops.org/submitresult.php?number=3048061,
>> > appears every packet triggers that.
>>
>> The warning comes from the function rix_to_ndx() in rc80211_minstrel.c:
>>
>> /* convert mac80211 rate index to local array index */
>> static inline int
>> rix_to_ndx(struct minstrel_sta_info *mi, int rix)
>> {
>> int i = rix;
>> for (i = rix; i >= 0; i--)
>> if (mi->r[i].rix == rix)
>> break;
>> WARN_ON(i < 0);
>> return i;
>> }
>>
>> > Can provide lots of debugging info.
>>
>> My impression is that WARN_ON is not warranted in that function, but it
>> would be interesting to know how you got to that point.
>
> I am using the rt73usb, WEP, adhoc, fixed rate(11M) on both ends:
>
> wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"XXXXXXXX"
> Mode:Ad-Hoc Frequency:2.442 GHz Cell: F6:B2:CB:FC:62:6C
> Tx-Power=20 dBm
> Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
> Encryption key: XXXXXXXXXX
> Power Management:on
>
> It is 2.6.34-rc4, no compat-wireless.
>
> As of unusual circumstances - the rt73usb driver has some bug that causes
> very high retransmit rates. On the opposite end the ath5k driver complains "cant
> handle jumbo frames".
> I had it perfectly working some time ago but need to figure out which off the many
> patches did it and apply it to the new kernel.
> This might stress minstrel more than needed but otoh it was my impression that the
> warning was triggered by every single packet.
>
> Let me know if you want any more info.
This warning typically shows up, whenever the driver reports a rate to
minstrel in the tx status that is not part of the supported/negotiated
rate set - that's the reason the index lookup above fails.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-18 8:56 rc80211_minstrel.c:70 WARNING with 2.6.34-rc4 Richard Zidlicky
2010-04-19 16:34 ` Pavel Roskin
2010-04-19 17:41 ` Richard Zidlicky
2010-04-19 17:41 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2010-04-19 17:55 ` Richard Zidlicky
2010-04-19 18:00 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-04-22 21:38 ` Pavel Roskin
2010-04-22 22:15 ` Richard Zidlicky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BCC95CC.7030109@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=rz@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.