From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Lawnick Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: Multiplexed I2C bus core support. Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:05:30 +0200 Message-ID: <4BCD523A.5030408@gmx.de> References: <4B5D8AFC.5060209@gmx.de> <20100415144906.2a20588d@hyperion.delvare> <20100416132144.5ea8b0b1@hyperion.delvare> <4BC861B3.3090806@gmx.de> <20100416152329.29f3f90d@hyperion.delvare> <4BCC2277.3090406@gmx.de> <20100419144014.5123b1b4@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100419144014.5123b1b4-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Rodolfo Giometti List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Jean Delvare said the following: > We don't want to do hardware probing at all to determine address > business. Look at the i2c-core code as it exists today: address > business is a solely software issue as far as i2c-core is concerned; > I see no good reason to change that just because we add support for > multiplexing. > > I hope this clarified my point. > I think you were clear, given the unhappiness I feel :-( I'll be back... -- Kind Regards, Michael