From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
To: ltp-list <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] prio-wake: avoid glibc to kernel sleep race
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:23:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BCF5EB6.1040005@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B61E7F7.3000502@us.ibm.com>
This patch does not appear in current CVS. Please apply.
Thanks,
Darren Hart
Darren Hart wrote:
> prio-wake: avoid glibc to kernel sleep race
>
> In the unlocked broadcast scenario, there exists a race between when the
> running_threads variable reaches rt_threads and when the last worker_thread
> blocks in the kernel after a cond_wait(). It is possible for a thread to miss
> the broadcast if it fails to sleep before the broadcast is issued.
>
> The previous code did not guarantee a small window of time to allow the threads
> to get to sleep. It also used an unreasonably large sleep time which
> unnecessarily extended the length of the test run time. This patch ensures some
> time is given to the threads to get to sleep and at the same time uses a much
> shorter (1000x) sleep period which results in a 50-100x reduction in test run
> time. Lastly, two unecessary loops waiting for the threads to complete were
> removed, relying on pthread_join() instead to wait for the threads to complete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
>
> ---
> func/prio-wake/prio-wake.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: realtime/func/prio-wake/prio-wake.c
> ===================================================================
> --- realtime.orig/func/prio-wake/prio-wake.c
> +++ realtime/func/prio-wake/prio-wake.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,10 @@ void *master_thread(void* arg)
>
> /* make sure children are started */
> while (running_threads < rt_threads)
> - sleep(1);
> + usleep(1000);
> + /* give the worker threads a chance to get to sleep in the kernel
> + * in the unlocked broadcast case. */
> + usleep(1000);
>
> start = rt_gettime() - beginrun;
>
> @@ -120,8 +123,6 @@ void *master_thread(void* arg)
> if (locked_broadcast)
> rc = pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
>
> - while (running_threads > 0)
> - sleep(1);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -157,9 +158,6 @@ void *worker_thread(void* arg)
>
> rc = pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
>
> - /* wait for all threads to quit */
> - while (running_threads > 0)
> - sleep(1);
> return NULL;
> }
>
--
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-21 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-28 19:39 [LTP] [PATCH] prio-wake: avoid glibc to kernel sleep race Darren Hart
2010-04-21 20:23 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2010-04-22 6:09 ` Rishikesh K Rajak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BCF5EB6.1040005@us.ibm.com \
--to=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.