[Fwd: Benchmarking data from a raid machine 2.6.34-rc3]

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]

FYI...

I asked Keith if he could do xfs nobarrier runs as well.

If there are ext4 nobarrier runs "winning" it seems only fair.  :)

-Eric

[-- Attachment #2: Benchmarking data from a raid machine 2.6.34-rc3.eml --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 4135 bytes --]

From: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>
To: "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Benchmarking data from a raid machine 2.6.34-rc3
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:06:18 -0700
Message-ID: <1272067578.9664.40.camel@keith-laptop>

At long last here is a good data set for filesystem comparison.  It is
from 2.6.34-rc3 (unpatched). It compares ext3 ext4 ext4-nobarrier,
btrfs, btrfs-nocow, xfs and jfs on a software raid setup with a decent
spindle count. 

http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/2010-04-14_2004/2.6.34-rc3/2.6.34-rc3.html


As we know touring barriers off helps a lot with ext4 on this machine.
I think Steve Pratt send some notification to the btrfs folks. Feel free
to point others at this data.


A history from this setup can be found here:  (mostly btrfs related
data)

http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/history/History.html


I hope to be do these large data set runs once in every major kernel
revision life cycle. 

Thanks,
  Keith Mannthey
  LTC FS-Dev 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs