From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: listmail Subject: Re: Re: network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:57:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4BD31501.1090109@triad.rr.com> References: <20100418185506.GN1878@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "yingbin wang ;" Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Do you mind attaching the config for 2.6.18.8 ? I believe we should be comparing that with "config-2.6.31.13-high performance" Ronaldo C. A. Chaves wrote: > I compared the config-2.6.31-13xen* *with the config-2.6.31.13-high > performance. > > > 2010/4/24 yingbin wang > > > which .config you compare with? > > 2010/4/24 Ronaldo C. A. Chaves >: > > I compared the files and the difference is > > > > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m > > CONFIG_ATA_PIIX=m > > CONFIG_XEN_DEV_EVTCHN=y > > > > in config-2.6.31.13-high performance. > > > > >