Re: [PATCHv3] a new filesystem module for nilfs2

["Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko" <phcoder@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1354 bytes --]

Committed. One question:

+  .reserved_first_sector = 1,

This line claims that overwriting first sector of nilfs won't destroy any data or metadata. Is it so?


Jiro SEKIBA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you very much for the comments!
> I revised the patch to reflect the comments.
>
>   
>> +	{
>> +	  grub_error(GRUB_ERR_BAD_FS,"btree corruption\n");
>> +	  return -1;
>> +	}
>> What do you think about possible fallback to iterate over all nodes in case of fs corruption?
>>     
>
> The case that btree is corrupted, it's very hard to take any action to recover
> because it is not possible to distinguish which block has meta data
> or which block has data without btree information.
>
> nilfs2 has ability to mount old checkpoint by specifying checkpoint number.
> So using old checkpoint is one of the possible fallback if all the blocks
> belonging to the old checkpoint is healthy. But it requires some more work.
>
> thanks,
>
> regards
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel


-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 293 bytes --]