From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:17:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SAHYwG005324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:17:34 -0400 Received: from [10.36.5.196] (vpn1-5-196.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.196]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SAHWIV002582 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:17:33 -0400 Message-ID: <4BD80B3C.90307@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:17:32 +0200 From: Milan Broz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100428091338.DC90815F01D@c-in3ws--03-03.sv2.lotusliveops.com> In-Reply-To: <20100428091338.DC90815F01D@c-in3ws--03-03.sv2.lotusliveops.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] "ERROR:apitest failed" after make check cryptsetup 1.1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 04/28/2010 11:13 AM, Si St wrote: > "can you try svn snapshot first - does it work?" > What do you mean by "svn Snapshot"? I meant current devel code http://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/source/checkout (you have to run autoconf there. Or wait few days for 1.1.1 release) > Don't understand the expression, I am probably a too weak newbie in this game. > > I have by the way ended all attemps of make install until it is 100%. I dont dare to mess up my SLED10, > but in case I later should or ought to update I will do it on Your recommendation. So far the cryptsetup 1.0.3 works fine and smooth for me. I have no access to SLED10 currently, but it is possible that only test is broken because of unsupported IV option - can you try this change? http://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/source/diff?spec=svn201&r=201&path=/trunk/tests/apitest.c The test were written primarily for maintainers, so it is quite possible that it fails on some old system, but I'll try to fix them in next release. Milan