From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Constantine Subject: Re: Directory Delegations and Negative Caching Status Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:25:53 -0700 Message-ID: <4BD86FA1.6010108@disney.com> References: <4BD86CC1.7050405@disney.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mailgate2.disneyanimation.com ([198.187.190.102]:17993 "EHLO mailgate2.disneyanimation.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753349Ab0D1Rf0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:35:26 -0400 Received: from [172.30.165.208] (lyre.fas.fa.disney.com [172.30.165.208]) by mailhub.fa.disney.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFCC124141 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BD86CC1.7050405-P5ys19MLBK/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Re-sending to the non-deprecated list... On 04/28/2010 10:13 AM, Kevin Constantine wrote: > Hey Everyone- > I was hoping that someone might provide an update on the status of > Directory Delegations and specifically the Negative Caching pieces that > are talked about here: > > http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/CITI_Experience_with_Directory_Delegations > > > Thanks so much > > -kevin