From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Christie Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] qla4xxx: Added support for ISP82XX Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:45:51 -0500 Message-ID: <4BD8E4CF.1030501@cs.wisc.edu> References: <20100428061431.GA11197@sles11sp1b1.qlogic.org> <4BD7D7A1.3040507@cs.wisc.edu> <1272497102.14756.46.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sabe.cs.wisc.edu ([128.105.6.20]:37884 "EHLO sabe.cs.wisc.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751798Ab0D2BqZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:46:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1272497102.14756.46.camel@mulgrave.site> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: "ravi.anand" , Vikas Chaudhary , Linux-SCSI Mailing List , Karen Higgins , Randy Dunlap On 04/28/2010 06:25 PM, James Bottomley wrote: >> Are you going to pull in all the other patches except this one ? >> We can resubmit this one once Mike get a chance to review it. > > Um, so I understood the comment to mean that Mike is still waiting for > you to comment on his questions and sugestions for patches 9,8,6,1 of > the original 12 patch series from 6 April ... unless I missed them? > They sent me mails offlist for my review comments. The reworked patches they are sending in this patcheset are a result of that work, so all the patches but "[PATCH 09/11] qla4xxx: Added support for ISP82XX" are ok. It might be ok, but I have not looked at it in depth. I was trying to say before that I have not looked at it because we had been working on the other patches. > As long as this 11 patch series reviews and applies independently, I'm > fine with dropping this and taking the rest. They should. I applied all but the 9/11 one, built them and ran them ok.