From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Constantine Subject: Re: Directory Delegations and Negative Caching Status Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:39:32 -0700 Message-ID: <4BD9B644.3030305@disney.com> References: <4BD86CC1.7050405@disney.com> <4BD86FA1.6010108@disney.com> <20100428174547.GO17491@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from mailgate2.disneyanimation.com ([198.187.190.102]:43139 "EHLO mailgate2.disneyanimation.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757879Ab0D3RAA (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:00:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100428174547.GO17491@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/28/2010 10:45 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:25:53AM -0700, Kevin Constantine wrote: >> Re-sending to the non-deprecated list... > > Hm, the forwarding from it to here doesn't seem to be working. > > Anyway, no, as far as I know, nobody is working on directory > delegations. > Ahh bummer. That's too bad. Thanks for the update Bruce. -kevin > --b. > >> >> On 04/28/2010 10:13 AM, Kevin Constantine wrote: >>> Hey Everyone- >>> I was hoping that someone might provide an update on the status of >>> Directory Delegations and specifically the Negative Caching pieces that >>> are talked about here: >>> >>> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/CITI_Experience_with_Directory_Delegations >>> >>> >>> Thanks so much >>> >>> -kevin >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html