From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4BDD4103.5090609@domain.hid> Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 11:08:19 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4BD5987A.2050804@domain.hid> <4BD59A48.5070002@domain.hid> <4BD5BA03.5000101@domain.hid> <1272331158.28983.287.camel@domain.hid> <4BD68843.4030806@domain.hid> <1272356029.28983.333.camel@domain.hid> <4BD69F7D.9060006@domain.hid> <1272359559.28983.380.camel@domain.hid> <4BD6AE1E.6050704@domain.hid> <1272360740.28983.382.camel@domain.hid> <4BD6AFC2.1090300@domain.hid> <1272361898.28983.395.camel@domain.hid> <4BD6BF21.20303@domain.hid> <1272734766.2440.46.camel@domain.hid> <4BDC6924.2070302@domain.hid> <1272740361.2440.49.camel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1272740361.2440.49.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2DE50D444BD65E31525BBD93" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] nucleus: Plug race between rpi_clear_remote and rpi_next List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe Gerum Cc: xenomai-core This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2DE50D444BD65E31525BBD93 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 19:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> Don't you think that, quoting yourself: >>> >>> "I have to confess, I do not understand how the patch may relate to o= ur >>> crash. But that's because I still only have a semi-understanding of t= his >>> frightening complex RPI code" >>> >>> does not fit that well with any kind of strong assertion made later o= n >>> the same topic, not backed by facts? >> See, as long as you do not directly explain why my concerns on this >> naturally racy construct were not valid (I brought up quite a few >> concrete questions), >=20 > Which were answered. And you seem to consider that a construct is racy > by design without taking care of understanding why they could be > perfectly valid in the proper context. This is what I was pointing out,= > all time long. Depends on the POV. But what counts is the outcome of this, and that's a fix. Jan --------------enig2DE50D444BD65E31525BBD93 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkvdQQkACgkQitSsb3rl5xR7NgCfX4tqqLgz9r4W5O/sxYvr7Dia V34AoK0iS7iHK+0x8DnTf+xibQ1lY+R2 =O9lk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2DE50D444BD65E31525BBD93--