From: Yinghai <yinghai.lu@oracle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
trenn@suse.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.31.13] Build failure at arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 10:50:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BDF0CF1.5070006@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100503174422.GC11676@suse.de>
On 05/03/2010 10:44 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:16:06AM -0700, Yinghai wrote:
>> On 05/01/2010 11:07 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 01:10:59PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>>>> Commit d539e5576605d048e6aeb21cbe3a8e71dc5eea81 "x86: Fix SCI on IOAPIC != 0"
>>>> introduced "void setup_IO_APIC_irq_extra(u32 gsi)" which calls
>>>> mp_find_ioapic() and mp_find_ioapic_pin().
>>>>
>>>> This commit does not compile if CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y and CONFIG_ACPI=n .
>>>
>>> Why would you want to build without ACPI on any modern system? Anyway,
>>> have a fix for this?
>>>
>> maybe just put #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI around the callee etc?
>
> Ick. How was it solved upstream?
>
those two functions are moved to arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
maybe you can put that patch to 2.6.31.xx?
YH
commit 2a4ab640d3c28c2952967e5f63ea495555bf2a5f
Author: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Date: Tue Jul 7 23:01:15 2009 -0400
ACPI, x86: expose some IO-APIC routines when CONFIG_ACPI=n
Some IO-APIC routines are ACPI specific now, but need to
be exposed when CONFIG_ACPI=n for the benefit of SFI.
Remove #ifdef ACPI around these routines:
io_apic_get_unique_id(int ioapic, int apic_id);
io_apic_get_version(int ioapic);
io_apic_get_redir_entries(int ioapic);
Move these routines from ACPI-specific boot.c to io_apic.c:
uniq_ioapic_id(u8 id)
mp_find_ioapic()
mp_find_ioapic_pin()
mp_register_ioapic()
Also, since uniq_ioapic_id() is now no longer static,
re-name it to io_apic_unique_id() for consistency
with the other public io_apic routines.
For simplicity, do not #ifdef the resulting code ACPI || SFI,
thought that could be done in the future if it is important
to optimize the !ACPI !SFI IO-APIC x86 kernel for size.
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201004120230.o3C2UhfQ050532@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
[not found] ` <20100412024446.GA28141@suse.de>
2010-04-12 4:10 ` [2.6.31.13] Build failure at arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c Tetsuo Handa
2010-05-01 18:07 ` Greg KH
2010-05-03 17:16 ` Yinghai
2010-05-03 17:44 ` Greg KH
2010-05-03 17:50 ` Yinghai [this message]
2010-05-03 17:58 ` Greg KH
2010-05-06 22:44 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BDF0CF1.5070006@oracle.com \
--to=yinghai.lu@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.