From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4BDFD008.9060106@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 09:43:04 +0200 From: Stefan Kisdaroczi MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4BDE8F79.5010905@domain.hid> <4BDF19ED.7060104@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4BDF19ED.7060104@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0A83D6D563C951BEDA0CD880" Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] debian: sync with 2.5.2-2 from debian.org, List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix , Roland Stigge Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0A83D6D563C951BEDA0CD880 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 03.05.2010 20:46, schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix: > Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >> Hi Philippe, >> >> Roland Stigge has accepted the "group xenomai" patch and uploaded xeno= mai 2.5.2-2 to debian unstable. >> I have attached a patch against rpm/for-upstream to sync up with 2.5.2= -2. >> Please ignore other patches I sent earlier, the attached patch contain= s them. Thanks. >=20 > Reading your patch, maybe libxenomai.so.0 should be called libxenomai.s= o.1 ? The comment in the libxenomai1.lintian hunk was added by Roland, so it's = probably better to ask him. Roland, what do you think ? Stefan --------------enig0A83D6D563C951BEDA0CD880 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFL39AMIPTw9rIdn6oRAukaAJ485i8YQGA7ukPNsWiJWLUzO8YfuACfQEmv wNMnekDZ2kuItfWPj6b16QQ= =2Ea8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0A83D6D563C951BEDA0CD880--