From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Philosophical question about channel selection
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 12:54:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE05F6B.3060705@lwfinger.net> (raw)
A question has been posed on the openSUSE wireless forum that I do not
know how to answer.
In a given neighborhood, there are 802.11g APs at roughly the same
strength on channels 1 and 10 (yes - 10). As this configuration ensures
that there are no clear channels, what would be the best choice? As I
see it, the options are ch 1 with interference across the full channel
width, ch 6 with interference only at the upper end, or ch 11. Which
would get the best throughput?
Thanks,
Larry
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-04 17:54 Larry Finger [this message]
2010-05-04 18:11 ` Philosophical question about channel selection Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE05F6B.3060705@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.