From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: fix another source of corrupt frames
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 21:36:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE0773A.8090009@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u2q43e72e891005041109i5106ba24ma7345c4f4c4fde21@mail.gmail.com>
On 2010-05-04 8:09 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> wrote:
>> Atheros hardware supports receiving frames that span multiple
>> descriptors and buffers. In this case, the rx status of every
>> descriptor except for the last one is invalid and may contain random
>> data. Because the driver does not support this, it needs to drop such
>> frames.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
>> ---
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common.c
>> @@ -57,13 +57,19 @@ static bool ath9k_rx_accept(struct ath_c
>> * rs_more indicates chained descriptors which can be used
>> * to link buffers together for a sort of scatter-gather
>> * operation.
>> - *
>> + * reject the frame, we don't support scatter-gather yet and
>> + * the frame is probably corrupt anyway
>> + */
>> + if (rx_stats->rs_more)
>> + return false;
>
> Actually this is required by ath9k_htc, it does process these, but
> ath9k doesn't so this could be done within ath9k itself.
I don't see any place in ath9k_htc that processes rs_more. And even if
it did, processing the rx status of a frame that has more descriptors
chained after it would be wrong, since the rx status is only valid for
the last frame of the descriptor chain.
I think my patch would work fine for ath9k_htc as well.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-04 7:58 [PATCH] ath9k: fix another source of corrupt frames Felix Fietkau
2010-05-04 18:09 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-05-04 18:36 ` John W. Linville
2010-05-04 19:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-05-04 19:36 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2010-05-04 19:55 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-05-05 5:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE0773A.8090009@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.