From: Steffen Sledz <sledz@dresearch.de>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: linux vs. linux-libc-headers?
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 12:00:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE141CA.30904@dresearch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100505094242.GF2444@xora-desktop.xora.org.uk>
Am 05.05.2010 11:42, wrote Graeme Gregory:
> I thought glibc was supposed to gracefully fall back on missing syscalls?
May be, but not satisfactorily.
E.g. we've seen that g_file_monitor (from glib) falls back to
polling each second instead of using inotify_init.
In addition we've mentioned problems with rsyslog (epoll_create1)
or udev-151.
--
Steffen Sledz
DResearch Digital Media Systems GmbH
Otto-Schmirgal-Str.3, D-10319 Berlin, Germany
Tel: +49 (30) 515932237 mailto:sledz@DResearch.DE
Fax: +49 (30) 515932299 http://www.DResearch.DE
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Weber, Werner Mögle;
Amtsgericht Berlin Charlottenburg; HRB 54412;
Ust.-IDNr. DE169013825; WEEE Reg.-Nr. DE 85995642
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-05 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-05 9:36 linux vs. linux-libc-headers? Steffen Sledz
2010-05-05 9:42 ` Graeme Gregory
2010-05-05 10:00 ` Steffen Sledz [this message]
2010-05-05 10:05 ` Phil Blundell
2010-05-05 14:50 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-05-06 10:15 ` [PATCH] angstrom-2008.1: use linux-libc-headers 2.6.24 for hipox machine Steffen Sledz
2010-05-06 10:42 ` Koen Kooi
2010-05-06 10:47 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-05-07 6:59 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-05-07 7:23 ` Koen Kooi
2010-05-07 7:35 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-05-10 7:36 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-05-10 8:34 ` Koen Kooi
2010-05-10 16:46 ` Tom Rini
2010-05-06 12:03 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-05-07 9:03 ` linux vs. linux-libc-headers? Phil Blundell
2010-05-10 9:15 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-05-12 10:10 ` Phil Blundell
2010-05-10 14:53 ` Kernel Headers Quality Issue (was: linux vs. linux-libc-headers?) Thilo Fromm
2010-05-10 16:55 ` Tom Rini
2010-05-10 19:00 ` Khem Raj
2010-05-14 9:25 ` Kernel Headers Quality Issue Thilo Fromm
2010-05-14 13:05 ` Phil Blundell
2010-05-11 7:19 ` Thilo Fromm
2010-05-10 19:14 ` Kernel Headers Quality Issue (was: linux vs. linux-libc-headers?) Tom Rini
2010-05-11 7:42 ` Kernel Headers Quality Issue Steffen Sledz
2010-05-11 14:27 ` Tom Rini
2010-05-12 6:02 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-05-12 15:23 ` Tom Rini
2010-05-12 16:53 ` Mark Brown
2010-05-13 11:40 ` Phil Blundell
2010-05-14 9:59 ` Thilo Fromm
2010-05-14 10:25 ` Phil Blundell
2010-05-14 11:40 ` Thilo Fromm
2010-05-14 12:38 ` Phil Blundell
2010-05-18 0:14 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE141CA.30904@dresearch.de \
--to=sledz@dresearch.de \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.