All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Booting/installing WindowsNT
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 14:35:40 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE1580C.7030305@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE14611.4080307@amd.com>

On 05/05/2010 01:18 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 05.05.2010 12:32, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>> On 05/04/2010 06:27 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 3. In all other cases so far it BSoDs with STOP 0x3E error
>>>>>> right before displaying that kernel message.
>>>>> MSDN talks about a mulitprocessor configuration error:
>>>>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms819006.aspx
>>>>> I suspected the offline CPUs in the mptable that confuse NT. But -smp
>>>>> 1,maxcpus=1 does not make a difference. I will try to dig deeper in
>>>>> this area.
>>> OK, I tackled this down. It is the max CPUID level that differs.
>>> In the AMD CPUID guide leafs 0000_0002 till 0000_0004 are reserved, the
>>> CPU that Michael and I used (K8RevF) actually have a max leaf of 1 
>>> here.
>>> Default qemu64 has a max leaf of 4.
>>> So by saying -cpu qemu64,level=1 (or 2 or 3) it works for me.
>>> Modern OS only read leaf 4 on Intel systems, it seems that NT4 is
>>> missing this.
>>
>> Confirmed, with -cpu qemu64,level=[123] it works for me as well.
> The strange thing is that NT4 never reads leaf 4:
> kvm-2341  [003]   228.527874: kvm_cpuid: func 40000000 rax 0 rbx 
> 4b4d564b rcx 564b4d56 rdx 4d
> kvm-2341  [003]   228.530033: kvm_cpuid: func 1 rax 623 rbx 800 rcx 
> 80002001 rdx 78bfbfd
> kvm-2341  [003]   228.530081: kvm_cpuid: func 80000000 rax 8000000a 
> rbx 68747541 rcx 444d4163 rdx 69746e65
> kvm-2341  [003]   228.530084: kvm_cpuid: func 80000008 rax 3028 rbx 0 
> rcx 0 rdx 0
> kvm-2341  [003]   228.530147: kvm_cpuid: func 1 rax 623 rbx 800 rcx 
> 80002001 rdx 78bfbfd
> kvm-2341  [002]   228.538254: kvm_cpuid: func 1 rax 623 rbx 800 rcx 
> 80002001 rdx 78bfbfd
> kvm-2341  [002]   228.539902: kvm_cpuid: func 1 rax 623 rbx 800 rcx 
> 80002001 rdx 78bfbfd
> kvm-2341  [002]   236.273370: kvm_cpuid: func 1 rax 623 rbx 800 rcx 
> 80002001 rdx 78bfbfd
> kvm-2341  [002]   236.273381: kvm_cpuid: func 0 rax 4 rbx 68747541 rcx 
> 444d4163 rdx 69746e65

So maybe it's just a simple guest bug that was never encountered in real 
life because no processors had that leaf.

>
> With level=4 it BSODs afterwards, with level=1 it beyond that:
> kvm-2472  [002]   871.379192: kvm_cpuid: func 1 rax 623 rbx 800 rcx 
> 80002001 rdx 78bfbfd
> kvm-2472  [002]   871.379235: kvm_cpuid: func 0 rax 1 rbx 68747541 rcx 
> 444d4163 rdx 69746e65
> kvm-2472  [002]   871.379238: kvm_cpuid: func 1 rax 623 rbx 800 rcx 
> 80002001 rdx 78bfbfd
> ....
>
> Interestingly it also accesses leaf 8000_0008, I thought that that 
> leaf wasn't around in 1996.

It's the bios:
src/mtrr.c:            cpuid(0x80000008u, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-05 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-30 20:59 Booting/installing WindowsNT Michael Tokarev
2010-04-30 21:40 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-05-02 10:04   ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-02 16:12     ` Michael Tokarev
2010-05-02 16:40       ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-02 16:44         ` Michael Tokarev
2010-05-03  8:24       ` Andre Przywara
2010-05-03  8:48         ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-03  9:28           ` Andre Przywara
2010-05-03 17:03             ` Michael Tokarev
2010-05-04  9:06               ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-04 12:08                 ` Andre Przywara
2010-05-04 12:40                   ` Michael Tokarev
2010-05-04 15:27                     ` Andre Przywara
2010-05-04 16:23                       ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-05  4:35                         ` Michael Tokarev
2010-05-05  8:32                         ` Andre Przywara
2010-05-05  8:41                           ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-05  8:53                             ` Andre Przywara
2010-05-05  8:51                           ` Michael Tokarev
2010-05-05  8:59                             ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-05 10:18                             ` Andre Przywara
2010-05-05 11:35                               ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-05-03 16:54         ` Michael Tokarev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BE1580C.7030305@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.