From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4BE262F3.70604@domain.hid>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 08:34:27 +0200
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4BDE8F79.5010905@domain.hid>
	<4BDF19ED.7060104@domain.hid>	<4BDFD008.9060106@domain.hid>
	<4BDFD704.7070902@domain.hid> <4BE0634E.8080005@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <4BE0634E.8080005@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] debian: sync with 2.5.2-2
	from	debian.org, 
List-Id: Xenomai life and development <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: xenomai@xenomai.org

On 05/04/2010 08:11 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> What I meant is that we could artificially increment the library ABI
> version, so that we get in-line with the package name. Of course, we
> pretend we broke the ABI whereas we did not really do it, but it looks
> harmless (but is it really?).

Just change it for the next ABI changes. No actions really required,
currently.

bye,
  Roland