From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm mmu: reduce 50% memory usage
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 15:03:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE269D4.9090108@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100430154427.GA32340@amt.cnet>
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 09:43:40PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 04/29/2010 09:09 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> You missed quadrant on 4mb large page emulation with shadow (see updated
>>> patch below).
>> Good catch.
>>
>>> Also for some reason i can't understand the assumption
>>> does not hold for large sptes with TDP, so reverted for now.
>> It's unrelated to TDP, same issue with shadow. I think the
>> calculation is correct. For example the 4th spte for a level=2 page
>> will yield gfn=4*512.
>
> Under testing i see sp at level 2, with sp->gfn == 4096, mmu_set_spte
> setting index 8 to gfn 4096 (whereas kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn returns 4096 +
> 8*512).
>
> Lai, can you please take a look at it? You should see the
> kvm_mmu_page_set_gfn BUG_ON by using -mem-path on hugetlbfs.
>
Could you tell me how you test it? It will be better if I follow
your test steps.
I also hit the kvm_mmu_page_set_gfn BUG_ON, It is because
FNAME(fetch)() set sp->gfn wrong. The patch:
[PATCH] kvm: calculate correct gfn for small host pages which emulates large guest pages
fix it.
I can not hit kvm_mmu_page_set_gfn BUG_ON after this patch also
applied.
So could you tell me your test steps:
The host: ept/npt enabled? 64bit? testing codes in host?
The guest: OS? PAE? 32bit? 64bit? testing codes in guest?
Lai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-06 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-28 11:57 [PATCH] kvm mmu: reduce 50% memory usage Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-28 13:01 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-28 18:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-04-29 18:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-04-29 18:43 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <4BDA3F9B.8040708@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-04-30 7:26 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <4BDA9AAC.6060303@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-04-30 10:00 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-30 15:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-06 7:03 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2010-05-06 19:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-07 8:25 ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-05-07 20:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-26 8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/3] kvm, tdp: calculate correct base gfn for non-DIR level Lai Jiangshan
2010-05-26 10:15 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE269D4.9090108@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.