From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gihan Munasinghe Subject: Re: [PATCH] vncpassword support in libxl Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 17:12:38 +0100 Message-ID: <4BE2EA76.4020005@flexiant.com> References: <4BE2D9B9.8010908@flexiant.com> <4BE2E434.6040001@flexiant.com> <19426.59907.68893.972136@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <19426.59907.68893.972136@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Jackson wrote: > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vncpassword support in libxl"): > >> The indentation is often wrong and sometimes you are adding\removing >> blank lines for no reason. >> But apart from this small cosmetic issues the patch looks good. >> > > You missed that he removed this line: > > - printf("Parsing config file %s\n", config_file); > > This demonstrates why patches with spurious stuff in should be > rejected - it's too easy to miss a mistake when scanning past a lot of > spurious changes. > > Ian. > > > Yes my mad will do the changes and resubmit again