From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocaml NetBSD support
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:45:36 +0100
Message-ID: <4BE42790.40001@eu.citrix.com>
References: <201005071413.18544.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
	<4BE40C52.7070605@eu.citrix.com>
	<201005071539.33411.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <201005071539.33411.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 07/05/10 14:39, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Why is libxc redundant ? Why don't you reuse the existing one?

we want to get rid of the redundant copy, but its not as simple as it 
looks. there's some unfortunate interactions with ocaml and pthread and 
we have found the hard way in the past, that they don't mix really well.

-- 
Vincent