From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>,
ebiederm@xmission.com, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
xiaosuo@gmail.com, adobriyan@gmail.com,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v10 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 12:01:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE7851D.2090304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100505103033.5600.77502.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
(Adding Andrew into Cc, hope can hear from him.)
On 05/05/10 18:26, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> Changes from the previous version:
> - Use 'true' and 'false' for bool's;
> - Fix some coding style problems;
> - Allow appending lines to bitmap proc file so that it will be
> easier to add new bits.
>
> ------------------>
>
> This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports which
> allows users to reserve ports for third-party applications.
>
> The reserved ports will not be used by automatic port assignments
> (e.g. when calling connect() or bind() with port number 0). Explicit
> port allocation behavior is unchanged.
>
> There are still some miss behaviors with regard to proc parsing in odd
> invalid cases (for "40000\0-40001" all is acknowledged but only 40000
> is accepted) but they are not easy to fix without changing the current
> "acknowledge how much we accepted" behavior.
>
> Because of that and because the same issues are present in the
> existing proc_dointvec code as well I don't think its worth holding
> the actual feature (port reservation) after such petty error recovery
> issues.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-10 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-05 10:26 [Patch v10 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Amerigo Wang
2010-05-05 10:26 ` [Patch 1/3] sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code Amerigo Wang
2010-05-05 10:26 ` [Patch 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap Amerigo Wang
2010-05-05 10:27 ` [Patch 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Amerigo Wang
2010-05-10 4:01 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2010-05-16 6:28 ` [Patch v10 0/3] " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE7851D.2090304@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.