From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: pvfb: Absolute vs relative mouse tracking mystery Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 13:15:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4BE86945.9050408@goop.org> References: <4BE49501.6000408@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/10/2010 07:41 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 7 May 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> On one of my host machines, in PV guests using pvfb I get proper >> absolute mouse tracking. >> >> On another host machine, I get relative tracking in pvfb-using guests. >> >> Both are using identical versions of Fedora 12, identical domain >> configs, and toolstacks and kernels built from the same source. The log >> files of the X servers are more or less identical. >> >> Help? Any clues? >> >> > relative vs absolute depends on a node on xenstore called > "request-abs-pointer" that defaults to 0 and has to be written by the > guest. > OK, it looks like it is being set, but the guest is still showing relative behaviour: vkbd = "" 0 = "" backend = "/local/domain/0/backend/vkbd/5/0" backend-id = "0" state = "4" page-ref = "1137660" event-channel = "11" request-abs-pointer = "1" Does this mean qemu-dm's vnc server is not doing the right thing? J