From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibft: Use IBFT_SIGN instead of open-coding the search string. Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 16:53:11 -0700 Message-ID: <4BEB3F67.4050608@zytor.com> References: <4BEAB683.8040600@redhat.com> <1273674308-9366-1-git-send-email-pjones@redhat.com> <201005121035.33199.konrad@kernel.org> <20100512123323.2badc5a7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:51948 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750805Ab0EMAAZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 20:00:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100512123323.2badc5a7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Peter Jones , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gpxe-devel@etherboot.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org On 05/12/2010 12:33 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 12 May 2010 10:35:32 -0400 > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> Please also consider this patch with the others I've sent. >> I've put this (and the other ones) on: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/ibft-2.6.git dev.ibft > > Well, you're the maintainer and you have a git tree and I cannot tell > the difference between an IBFT and a bar of soap. So I suggest that > you ask Stephen to permanently include your git tree in linux-next and > send Linus a pull request in the 2.6.35-rc1 merge window like so many > other people do? > Either that or send it via Len Brown, since iBFT really is an ACPI extension. -hpa