From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael J Gruber Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] All is too much Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 18:08:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4BED7574.4070503@drmicha.warpmail.net> References: <20100505033536.GB8779@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20100514060612.GA19652@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 14 18:08:27 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCxR4-0007sS-Im for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 18:08:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753391Ab0ENQIR (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2010 12:08:17 -0400 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:47793 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751979Ab0ENQIQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2010 12:08:16 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C975F6438; Fri, 14 May 2010 12:08:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 May 2010 12:08:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=lAj+/Ay47wCflFjvNxKf3yI6BLs=; b=q/NsCBVAQcUsH/mOdJ51d6JrztpRnIn6Z4NWz+RQzLTpuexI89PpaZatzSullTbyMoaCp6riWmzMk0XJbTCsQcHRNg8hZulrh1vIVmrlmfopSWLDh6uKdqdWaL7kHD06jK2Xh2P/QmkYf1cZxHLRLPaWC96weFsl6MOKwJwj0GM= X-Sasl-enc: veAXT71+hGiuRNGlnZqmf7GNgKyAicFWimJZNvvyJ9VW 1273853295 Received: from localhost.localdomain (heawood.math.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.44.4]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A766F4D2BB; Fri, 14 May 2010 12:08:14 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.5pre) Gecko/20100503 Lightning/1.0b2pre Lanikai/3.1b2pre In-Reply-To: <20100514060612.GA19652@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 14.05.2010 08:06: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 04:24:34PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > >> This series introduces --lrbranches and --locals as abbreviations >> for "HEAD --branches --remotes" (local and remote branches) resp. >> "HEAD --branches --tags" (local refs). > > Thanks. --lrbranches is still a little ugly to me, but it does address > my concern with --heads, and I don't have a better suggestion. > > Patch 4/4 itself looks OK. Did you test each part of the series > independently, though? It looks like 3/4 tests --lrbranches, which isn't > introduced until 4/4. Sheesh. I did test them individually, of course. That is, before reordering with rebase -i and "fixup!"ing the last one. I probably squashed them in the wrong order :( I always get confused by the ordering in the action script, which is just the reverse of git log --oneline. I'm sorry I didn't catch this myself, I'll rerebase-eee asap. Michael