From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes] sata_nv: use ata_pci_sff_activate_host() instead of ata_host_activate() Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 00:05:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4BEDC93C.80108@kernel.org> References: <4BED1C82.10102@kernel.org> <4BEDBCC1.5080700@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:48806 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752243Ab0ENWF6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2010 18:05:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BEDBCC1.5080700@garzik.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , stable , Robert Hancock Hello, On 05/14/2010 11:12 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > hmmmm. I agree 100% with this patch, but is it a recent regression? It's more than a year old at least. It's a bit surprising that no one reported this before. > At -rc7, we are trying hard to only include fixes for regressions. > > Around -rc1, I would stuff this into #upstream-fixes without hesitation. > But now, I'm thinking #upstream. Yeap, sure. We can wait some time after it makes -rc1 and then push it through -stable. Thanks. -- tejun