From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: "Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
Henning Fehrmann <henning.fehrmann@aei.mpg.de>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: loosing IPMI-card by loading netconsole
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 00:24:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BEDCD87.4090602@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273875413.15067.1348.camel@calx>
Hello,
On 05/15/2010 12:16 AM, Matt Mackall wrote:
>> Yeap, sure, it would be effective but I kind of want to leave
>> bisection as the last resort. Bisection is a somewhat painful process
>> especially when the machine isn't right next to you and someone who
>> has overall knowledge can often identify the problem much easier with
>> appropriate debugging info.
>
> Well nothing jumps to mind in the netpoll/netconsole code and I haven't
> heard any similar reports. My guess is it's something obscure, so I
> think the sooner you start bisecting... Even one or two tests will get
> us a lot closer to figuring out what changed in the last 1.5 years.
I see. I was hoping it would ring a bell to someone. We'll probably
try to provide the info Jesse asked and if that doesn't lead anywhere
start bisecting.
Thank you.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-14 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-14 13:45 loosing IPMI-card by loading netconsole Henning Fehrmann
2010-05-14 14:51 ` Ronciak, John
2010-05-14 16:27 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-14 16:39 ` Ronciak, John
2010-05-14 17:20 ` "Brandeburg, Jesse"
2010-05-14 22:18 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-15 8:26 ` Carsten Aulbert
2010-05-15 9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-15 9:36 ` Carsten Aulbert
2010-05-14 17:37 ` Matt Mackall
2010-05-14 22:11 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-14 22:16 ` Matt Mackall
2010-05-14 22:24 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-05-18 13:12 ` Henning Fehrmann
2010-05-20 10:16 ` Henning Fehrmann
2010-05-20 15:01 ` Allan, Bruce W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BEDCD87.4090602@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de \
--cc=henning.fehrmann@aei.mpg.de \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.