From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tokarev Subject: Re: Qemu-KVM Livate Migration 0.12.2 -> 0.12.3/4 broken? Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 13:11:30 +0400 Message-ID: <4BF10842.7060702@msgid.tls.msk.ru> References: <4BE93882.8050105@dlh.net> <4BEFDEE1.5070906@redhat.com> <4BF00592.5040403@redhat.com> <4BF0E988.1040505@redhat.com> <4BF0FCEF.3060204@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , Peter Lieven , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori To: Juan Quintela Return-path: Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([81.13.33.159]:51054 "EHLO isrv.corpit.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754671Ab0EQJLd (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 05:11:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 17.05.2010 13:07, Juan Quintela wrote: > Michael Tokarev wrote: [] >> http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg34051.html >> I wonder why it is not noticed before -- it's broken since 0.12... > > People has become rich and everybody has a 64 bit hardware :-) Actually I don't think there's a CPU that's 32bits and has necessary VT instructions. At least not the ones to care about - maybe there were some models but they'e not common and are gone long time ago. But apparently there are quite some people who use 32bit OS on 64bit-capable hardware, for one reason or another. I'm doing it due to historical reasons, but at least I'm running 64bit kernel... ;) > Will take a look at the end of the week. Thank you! /mjt From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41631 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ODwMN-0001AG-Mo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 05:11:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODwMK-0005rA-GH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 05:11:38 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([81.13.33.159]:42797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODwMJ-0005qW-93 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 05:11:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF10842.7060702@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 13:11:30 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4BE93882.8050105@dlh.net> <4BEFDEE1.5070906@redhat.com> <4BF00592.5040403@redhat.com> <4BF0E988.1040505@redhat.com> <4BF0FCEF.3060204@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu-KVM Livate Migration 0.12.2 -> 0.12.3/4 broken? List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: Peter Lieven , Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org 17.05.2010 13:07, Juan Quintela wrote: > Michael Tokarev wrote: [] >> http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg34051.html >> I wonder why it is not noticed before -- it's broken since 0.12... > > People has become rich and everybody has a 64 bit hardware :-) Actually I don't think there's a CPU that's 32bits and has necessary VT instructions. At least not the ones to care about - maybe there were some models but they'e not common and are gone long time ago. But apparently there are quite some people who use 32bit OS on 64bit-capable hardware, for one reason or another. I'm doing it due to historical reasons, but at least I'm running 64bit kernel... ;) > Will take a look at the end of the week. Thank you! /mjt