From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Wolf Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu-KVM 0.12.3 and Multipath -> Assertion Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 14:14:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4BF284AC.4030404@redhat.com> References: <4BDF3F94.1080608@dlh.net> <4BDFDC44.9030808@redhat.com> <4BE00750.6040804@dlh.net> <4BE01120.30608@redhat.com> <4BE02440.6010802@dlh.net> <4BE028BF.1000603@redhat.com> <20100504170706.GA21339@lst.de> <4BF27676.5000606@dlh.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter Lieven , Christoph Hellwig , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23663 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752655Ab0ERMPE (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 08:15:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BF27676.5000606@dlh.net> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 18.05.2010 13:13, schrieb Peter Lieven: > hi, > > will this patch make it into 0.12.4.1 ? > > br, > peter Anthony, can you please cherry-pick commit 38d8dfa1 into stable-0.12? Kevin > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 04:01:35PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> >>> Great, I'm going to submit it as a proper patch then. >>> >>> Christoph, by now I'm pretty sure it's right, but can you have another >>> look if this is correct, anyway? >>> >> >> It looks correct to me - we really shouldn't update the the fields >> until bdrv_aio_cancel has returned. In fact we cannot cancel a request >> more often than we can, so there's a fairly high chance it will >> complete. >> >> >> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig