From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tao Ma Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:10:15 +0800 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 00/17 V2] ocfs2: Support for discontiguous block group. In-Reply-To: <20100518224930.GN3239@mail.oracle.com> References: <4BCFEF22.7080607@oracle.com> <20100517192147.GB22775@mail.oracle.com> <4BF1D73F.3030600@oracle.com> <20100518224556.GM3239@mail.oracle.com> <20100518224930.GN3239@mail.oracle.com> Message-ID: <4BF31E57.3010401@oracle.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Joel Becker wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 03:45:56PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: > >> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 07:54:39AM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: >> >>>> Let me know if/when your discontig-bg branch has the code you >>>> want to go upstream. It may already; I'm just confirming before I pull. >>>> >>>> >>> It is ok there. please pull >>> >>> git://oss.oracle.com/git/tma/linux-2.6.git discontig-bg >>> >> Tao, >> This branch has the bogus orig_value_size fix. The good one is >> in the fixes branch, and they conflict. Also, you have three patches in >> this branch without descriptions: >> >> patch speedup.fix >> patch unwritten.fix >> patch DLM.fix >> >> Please fix this. >> > > Actually, your discontig-bg branch doesn't look much like this > patch series at all. > yes, there are 2 changes in this branch against the patch I sent to the mailist(you can check the commit time for it). 1. for the patch "ocfs2_claim_*() don't need an ocfs2_super argument", I rebased it since it has conflict with your new merge-window. 2. for the patch "Add ocfs2_gd_is_discontig", we need le16_to_cpu(bg->bg_size). Regards, Tao