From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benoit Cousson Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] OMAP: GPIO: Implement GPIO in HWMOD way Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:24:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4BF402AB.50308@ti.com> References: <1274194260-16401-1-git-send-email-charu@ti.com> <4BF3A72D.3080501@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:49488 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752075Ab0ESPYe (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 11:24:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Varadarajan, Charulatha" Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "Nayak, Rajendra" , "paul@pwsan.com" , "tony@atomide.com" , "khilman@deeprootsystems.com" On 5/19/2010 3:55 PM, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote: > >> From: Cousson, Benoit >> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 2:24 PM >> >> On 5/18/2010 4:50 PM, Charulatha V wrote: >>> This patch series implements GPIO module in platform device model. >>> It also makes OMAP2PLUS specific GPIO implemented in HWMOD FW way. >>> >>> This patch series is created on "origin/pm-wip/runtime". >>> >>> This patch series is tested on OMAP3430 SDP board. It would be of >>> great help if someone could test the same on OMAP1 and OMAP2 boards. >> >> What about OMAP4? Didn't you test it on SDP or Blaze? > > I tested this series on 4430SDP using an TI internal tree. Since origin/pm-wip/runtime branch does not have OMAP4 hwmod database, I did not mention about OMAP4. Since the OMAP4 data was posted one week ago (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/99052/), I think you can use them in order to validate on both OMAP3 & OMAP4 with the public code. Benoit