From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Autofs <autofs@linux.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] autofs: Pushdown the bkl from ioctl
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:04:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BF4445F.9040104@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100519190307.GC9752@nowhere>
On 05/19/2010 12:03 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>
>> But it's not ... it is locked at that point. It's not lock*ing*, but it
>> is not *unlocked*, either. Furthermore, it is directly contradicting
>> the naming scheme of the ops structure.
>>
>
> Would you prefer me to resend a patch?
>
Yes, that would be my preference.
We really need to set a date to kill off autofs3 completely -- I don't
care if we rename anything or not -- and add it to feature-removal.txt.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-19 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-19 17:24 [PATCH 0/8] Another set of ioctl bkl pushdown, almost the end Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 1/8] ecryptfs: Pushdown the bkl from ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-20 23:39 ` Tyler Hicks
2010-05-20 23:42 ` [PATCH] vfs/eCryptfs: Handle ioctl calls with unlocked and compat functions Tyler Hicks
2010-05-21 6:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-21 7:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 2/8] autofs: Pushdown the bkl from ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 18:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-19 18:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 18:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-19 18:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 19:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 20:04 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-05-20 11:35 ` Ian Kent
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 3/8] autofs4: " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 4/8] sunrpc: " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 5/8] sunrpc: Pushdown the bkl from sunrpc cache ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 6/8] uml: Pushdown the bkl from harddog_kern ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 7/8] cris: Pushdown the bkl from ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 8/8] ia64: Use unlocked_ioctl from perfmon Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-20 11:26 ` [PATCH 0/8] Another set of ioctl bkl pushdown, almost the end Jan Kara
2010-05-20 11:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BF4445F.9040104@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.