From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41315 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFVx0-0003AW-78 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 13:23:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFVwu-0005Nb-FL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 13:23:58 -0400 Received: from thoth.sbs.de ([192.35.17.2]:24743) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFVwu-0005N0-4t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 13:23:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF6C1A4.1020809@siemens.com> Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 19:23:48 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20091017002811.3816.18618.malonedeb@gangotri.canonical.com> <20100521115544.17238.22413.launchpad@loganberry.canonical.com> <20100521154252.GA12462@redhat.com> <4BF6B56D.4060406@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4BF6BFE9.2030300@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <4BF6BFE9.2030300@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Bug 453617] Re: kvm hangs at 100% cpu when connecting to forwarded ports (when listed incorrectly on the command line) List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gleb Natapov Jan Kiszka wrote: > Michael Tokarev wrote: >> 21.05.2010 19:42, Gleb Natapov wrote: >>>> ProblemType: Bug >>>> Architecture: amd64 >>>> Date: Fri Oct 16 17:19:59 2009 >>>> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 >>> What is the point forwarding distro bugs here? Can we have upstream bug >>> tracker to report upstream issues? >> Um, this _is_ upstream issue, as far as I can see. >> It exists in qemu-kvm-0.12.4 at least, I just verified. > > Well, this particular bug rather looks like a potential documentation > insufficiency: > > Instantiating two user space networking stacks on the _same_ vlan with > _identical_ parameters is just asking for troubles. If the reporter read > the manual and then did the mistake, we may have to clarify the docs > what "-net user" does. > >> What's wrong with that forwarding? > > IMHO so far nothing - as long as the ratio of pure downstream issues > remains low. I think we should give this channel a chance as it can be > advantageous to have more "real" end-user reports. That said, initial reports may show up here, but we do need some filter to sort out distro-specific updates - like this one. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux