Re: [PATCH]wireless:ath9k Fix ath_print in xmit.c

[Arnd Hannemann <arnd@arndnet.de>]

Am 26.05.2010 19:14, schrieb Justin P. Mattock:
> ath_print in xmit.c should say "Reseting hardware"
> instead of Reaseting HAL!(since HAL is being fazed out).
> dmesg shows:
> [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame
> [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL!
>
>  
>  Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c
> index 3db1917..2a0558e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c
> @@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ void ath_drain_all_txq(struct ath_softc *sc, bool retry_tx)
>  		int r;
>  
>  		ath_print(common, ATH_DBG_FATAL,
> -			  "Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL!\n");
> +			  "Unable to stop TxDMA. Reseting hardware!\n");
>   
1.) Should'nt it read "Resetting"
2.) Why "common" ? Seems it is ath9k specific so message should read
"ath9k: Failed to stop TX DMA"
3.) While we are at it write "TX DMA" instead of "TxDMA" just to be
consistent...
>  
>  		spin_lock_bh(&sc->sc_resetlock);
>  		r = ath9k_hw_reset(ah, sc->sc_ah->curchan, false);
>   

Best regards,
Arnd