All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: "S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@ti.com>
Cc: linux omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Angelo Arrifano <miknix@gmail.com>,
	"Zebediah C. McClure" <zmc@lurian.net>,
	Alistair Buxton <a.j.buxton@gmail.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, "Premi, Sanjeev" <premi@ti.com>,
	"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	"Guruswamy, Senthilvadivu" <svadivu@ti.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@nokia.com>,
	"Pandita, Vikram" <vikram.pandita@ti.com>,
	"S, Vishwanath" <vishwa.s@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] omap: move generic omap3 features to generic
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:21:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFE9C14.9040703@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinsrRAYX4dvB8A8wPayfRc7wkULQtUSiJ9RxbWh@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/27/2010 01:24 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
> Nishanth Menon<nm@ti.com>  wrote:

[..]
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
>> index 809e13a..01555b6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
>> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static void __init omap24xx_check_revision(void)
>>   #define OMAP3_CHECK_FEATURE(status,feat)                               \
>>         if (((status&  OMAP3_ ##feat## _MASK)                           \
>>                 >>  OMAP3_ ##feat## _SHIFT) != FEAT_ ##feat## _NONE) {   \
>> -               omap3_features |= OMAP3_HAS_ ##feat;                    \
>> +               omap_features |= OMAP_HAS_ ##feat;                      \
>>         }
>
> "CHECK" sounds like a querying API, whereas the macro populates data.
> Maybe UPDATE or SET ?
>
Depends on where you are looking at it from: overall it is checking the 
status bits from OMAP and deciding what features it has - this is 
specifically important for 35xx series of processors. it is indeed a 
check in that sense. if you look at it from features variable, yeah it 
is updating it, but the idea of usage of the Macro is: check in status 
if feature X is available.. which is what it does ;). btw, the intent of 
the current patch was not meant to rename CHECK_FEATURE as it was very 
OMAP3 specific ;)

>>   static void __init omap3_check_features(void)
>> @@ -310,20 +310,20 @@ static void __init omap3_cpuinfo(void)
>>                 /*
[...]

>> +OMAP_HAS_FEATURE(, l2cache, L2CACHE)
>> +OMAP_HAS_FEATURE(, sgx, SGX)
>> +OMAP_HAS_FEATURE(, iva, IVA)
>> +OMAP_HAS_FEATURE(, neon, NEON)
>> +OMAP_HAS_FEATURE(, isp, ISP)
>> +
>> +/*
>>   * Runtime detection of OMAP3 features
>>   */
>>   extern u32 omap3_features;
>>
>> -#define OMAP3_HAS_L2CACHE              BIT(0)
>> -#define OMAP3_HAS_IVA                  BIT(1)
>> -#define OMAP3_HAS_SGX                  BIT(2)
>> -#define OMAP3_HAS_NEON                 BIT(3)
>> -#define OMAP3_HAS_ISP                  BIT(4)
>>   #define OMAP3_HAS_192MHZ_CLK           BIT(5)
>>
>> -OMAP_HAS_FEATURE(3, l2cache, L2CACHE)
>> -OMAP_HAS_FEATURE(3, sgx, SGX)
>> -OMAP_HAS_FEATURE(3, iva, IVA)
>> -OMAP_HAS_FEATURE(3, neon, NEON)
>> -OMAP_HAS_FEATURE(3, isp, ISP)
>>   OMAP_HAS_FEATURE(3, 192mhz_clk, 192MHZ_CLK)
>>
>>   #endif
>> --
>
> What about feature detection for OMAP2 and OMAP4 (similar to
> omap3_check_features) ?
> At least a dummy implementation with warning messages would be good,
> so that they are not used without initialization.

there is no need for warning messages, they will return as feature not 
present. cpu.h is a common header and variable omap_features is in 
common.c, the check_feature and id.c has not set that bit, the variable 
will remain 0, hence omap_has_sgx() will return 0 unless someone enables 
that for lets say OMAP4 -> feel free to do it, as I mentioned in 0/6, 
this series was meant solely to reorganize and provide an infrastructure 
for further development.

Regards,
Nishanth Menon

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-27 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-23  3:36 [PATCH 0/6] introduce generic OMAP SOC features Nishanth Menon
2010-05-23  3:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] omap1: rename check_revision Nishanth Menon
2010-05-23  3:36   ` [PATCH 2/6] omap2/3: id: fix sparse warning Nishanth Menon
2010-05-23  3:36     ` [PATCH 3/6] omap: generic: introduce a single check_revision Nishanth Menon
2010-05-23  3:36       ` [PATCH 4/6] omap: improve OMAP3_HAS_FEATURE Nishanth Menon
2010-05-23  3:36         ` [PATCH 5/6] omap: introduce OMAP_SHOW_FEATURE Nishanth Menon
2010-05-23  3:36           ` [PATCH 6/6] omap: move generic omap3 features to generic Nishanth Menon
2010-05-27 11:24             ` Venkatraman S
2010-05-27 16:21               ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2010-05-31 16:06                 ` Venkatraman S
2010-05-31 17:09                   ` Nishanth Menon
2010-05-31 18:46                     ` Venkatraman S
2010-05-31 19:18                       ` Nishanth Menon
2010-06-01  5:34                         ` Venkatraman S
2010-06-01  6:23                           ` Nishanth Menon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BFE9C14.9040703@ti.com \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=a.j.buxton@gmail.com \
    --cc=aaro.koskinen@nokia.com \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miknix@gmail.com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=premi@ti.com \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=svadivu@ti.com \
    --cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=vikram.pandita@ti.com \
    --cc=vishwa.s@ti.com \
    --cc=zmc@lurian.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.