From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47990 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHzzk-0000vU-Mt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 09:53:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <vdkouwe@cs.vu.nl>) id 1OHzzg-000316-Ay
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 09:53:04 -0400
Received: from hera.amn.nl ([213.189.22.5]:4695 helo=AMN.nl)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <vdkouwe@cs.vu.nl>) id 1OHzzg-00030t-6w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 09:53:00 -0400
Message-ID: <4BFFCAA7.2040809@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 15:52:39 +0200
From: Erik van der Kouwe <vdkouwe@cs.vu.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: SVM emulation: EVENTINJ marked valid when a
	pagefault happens while issuing a software interrupt
References: <4BFE8F13.2000009@cs.vu.nl> <4BFEBF9E.90600@web.de>
	<4BFECCC3.2000806@cs.vu.nl> <4BFEF010.50300@web.de>
	<4BFF510B.9050508@cs.vu.nl> <4BFF5E73.70508@web.de>
	<20100528073531.GD3266@amd.com>
	<20100528132031.GG31920@shareable.org>
	<4BFFC56B.5010408@cs.vu.nl> <20100528134415.GB22539@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100528134415.GB22539@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>

Hi,

>> Would be nice to have nested VMX support though, given that Intel CPUs 
>> are so much more common than AMDs. I've been searching on the Dell 
>> website (in the Netherlands) for a laptop recently and I couldn't find a 
>> single AMD model.
> 
> That doesn't mean they are uncommon ;-) There are many vendors that
> offer notebooks with AMD processors.

In theory that is true but in practice it means that my next laptop 
probably won't have an AMD chip in it (which is pity because I really 
like my current AMD Dell except that it doesn't have SVM). It surprised 
me though because I thought Dell was also involved in the anti-trust 
suits against Intel.

With kind regards,
Erik