From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: What's the rationale for change d1efaaee441b "xend: Dis-allow device assignment if PoD is enabled."? Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:01:47 -0700 Message-ID: <4C002F3B.8090603@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Xu, Dongxiao" Cc: Xen-devel , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org What's the rationale for changeset d1efaaee441b? I'm seeing it when trying to attach a pci device to a PV domain with xm. I think the check is triggering because the domain is ballooned down a bit, but I'm not sure (is there some way to see what the static and dynamic memory sizes are for a domain with the tools?). As I understand it, PoD only applies to HVM domains. Should this check be made more specific? Thanks, J