From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756641Ab0E2BVU (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2010 21:21:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f204.google.com ([209.85.222.204]:42965 "EHLO mail-pz0-f204.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754789Ab0E2BVT (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2010 21:21:19 -0400 Message-ID: <4C006C11.7030309@vflare.org> Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 06:51:21 +0530 From: Nitin Gupta Reply-To: ngupta@vflare.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Pekka Enberg , Andrew Morton , Minchan Kim , Hugh Dickins , Cyp , driverdev , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] zram: generic RAM based compressed R/W block devices References: <1274710685-2351-1-git-send-email-ngupta@vflare.org> <4BFFEA95.9040505@vflare.org> <20100528162657.GA28781@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20100528162657.GA28781@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/28/2010 09:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:38:53PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> On 05/24/2010 07:48 PM, Nitin Gupta wrote: >>> Creates RAM based block devices: /dev/zramX (X = 0, 1, ...). >>> Pages written to these disks are compressed and stored in memory >>> itself. These disks allow very fast I/O and compression provides >>> good amounts of memory savings. >>> >>> This is enhancement over existing ramzswap driver which creates >>> virtual block devices (/dev/ramzswapX) which could be used only >>> as swap disks. >>> >>> Now, with the ability to handle any kind of I/O request, zram >>> devices have lot more use cases: >>> - /tmp storage >>> - various caches under /var >>> - swap disks >>> - maybe even more! :) >>> >>> Performance numbers can be found at: >>> http://code.google.com/p/compcache/wiki/zramperf >>> >> >> Any reviews/comments, please? > > We are all busy with the .35-rc1 merge work at the moment, sorry. > Thanks for your reply. Ok, in the meantime, I will further test it and keep building upon it. When rc1 workload is over, I think all this can be merged in linux-next? Thanks, Nitin