All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed()
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 12:06:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C038A08.8090209@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275300165.27810.21858.camel@twins>

On 05/31/2010 12:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 12:01 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>  but we can update cpu_active mask before other
>>> CPU_UP_PREPARE notifiers are executed so that it's symmetrical to cpu
>>> down path and then this problem goes away the exact same way, right?
>>
>> Ah, no, we cannot mark it active before its actually up, because at that
>> time we'll actually try and run stuff on it, which clearly won't work
>> when its not there to run stuff. 
> 
> So we should clear it _before_ we go down, and set it _after_ we're up.
> 

Yeah, sure, I misspoke.  I meant CPU_ONLINE not CPU_UP_PREPARE.  So,
we can mark a cpu active before other CPU_ONLINE callbacks are run.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-31 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-13 10:48 [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: consult online mask instead of active in select_fallback_rq() Tejun Heo
2010-05-31  8:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31  9:48     ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
2010-05-31  8:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31  9:55     ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:02         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:06           ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-05-31 10:15             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:19               ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:46                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 11:47                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: add hooks for workqueue Tejun Heo
2010-05-31  8:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31  9:58     ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:07         ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-17 23:13 ` [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq Tejun Heo
2010-05-21 13:25   ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-23  9:05     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-23  9:08       ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-23  9:13         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-23  9:24           ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-23 10:20             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-23 10:26               ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-27  8:26                 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C038A08.8090209@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.